Tag: supervised assessments

• Generative AI, plagiarism, and “cheating”

  

  Back in January, I wrote a post called Beyond Cheating, reflecting on the ChatGPT bans that were rolling out across various Australian states and the “cheating” narrative that had accompanied the chatbot since its release. In that earlier post, I argued that banning and blocking generative AI would only contribute to the digital divide –…

  Leon Furze

  September 20, 2023

  AI, assessment, curriculum, Digital, Ethics

  academic dishonesty, academic evaluation, Academic Integrity, AI advantages, AI and academic culture, AI and cheating, AI and plagiarism, AI and student workload, AI Assessment Scale, AI detection bias, AI detection software, AI disadvantages, AI ethics, AI Guidelines, AI in analytical essays, AI in classrooms, AI in educational policy, AI in essay writing, AI in Humanities, AI in secondary education, AI in skill demonstration, AI in tertiary education, Assessment Design, authentication methods, ChatGPT, Contract cheating, digital divide, digital literacy, digital technology, distance learning, education, educator perspectives, experiential tasks, formative assessment, GAI, Generative AI, GPTZero, lockdown browsers, non-native English writers, online courses, online learning, oral assessments, out-of-class assessments, proctoring software, summative assessment, supervised assessments, Turnitin, unsupervised assessments, viva, written tasks