Tag: AI Assessment Scale

• Generative AI, plagiarism, and “cheating”

  

  Back in January, I wrote a post called Beyond Cheating, reflecting on the ChatGPT bans that were rolling out across various Australian states and the “cheating” narrative that had accompanied the chatbot since its release. In that earlier post, I argued that banning and blocking generative AI would only contribute to the digital divide –…

  Leon Furze

  September 20, 2023

  AI, assessment, curriculum, Digital, Ethics

  academic dishonesty, academic evaluation, Academic Integrity, AI advantages, AI and academic culture, AI and cheating, AI and plagiarism, AI and student workload, AI Assessment Scale, AI detection bias, AI detection software, AI disadvantages, AI ethics, AI Guidelines, AI in analytical essays, AI in classrooms, AI in educational policy, AI in essay writing, AI in Humanities, AI in secondary education, AI in skill demonstration, AI in tertiary education, Assessment Design, authentication methods, ChatGPT, Contract cheating, digital divide, digital literacy, digital technology, distance learning, education, educator perspectives, experiential tasks, formative assessment, GAI, Generative AI, GPTZero, lockdown browsers, non-native English writers, online courses, online learning, oral assessments, out-of-class assessments, proctoring software, summative assessment, supervised assessments, Turnitin, unsupervised assessments, viva, written tasks

• Teaching Writing with Generative AI

  

  This post is based on a presentation I ran recently at the AATE conference. It takes the writing cycle approach from our book ‘Practical Writing Strategies‘ and applies Generative AI at various stages. One of the most pressing concerns at the recent Australian Association for the Teaching of English (AATE) conference was the implications of…

  Leon Furze

  July 13, 2023

  AI, Digital, Practical Writing Strategies, writing

  AATE conference, AI Assessment Scale, AI ethics, analytical writing, assessment task, audience, audience personas, audience profile, authentic audiences, bias, blogs, book, brainstorming, brainstorming and organizing ideas, burning questions, ChatGPT, ChatGPT (3.5), class time, Claude’s Anthropic, climate crisis, close reading, collaboration, collaborative workshop, context, conventions, Digital, embedding GAI, English teachers, ethical use, example unit, Exploration, fiction, figurative language, final proofing, functional grammar, GAI and the Writing Cycle, GAI technologies, Generative AI, generic feedback, Google’s Bard, ideas, literary critic personas, literary critique, literary journals, literature class critical journals, media, mentor texts, Microsoft’s Bing, nonfiction, peer assessment, peer assessment and workshops, personal voice, poetry slams, polishing, Practical Writing Strategies, presentation, print, product, publication, Purpose, school anthologies, school newsletters, self-assessment, self-directed skills development, sensory details, sentence structure, skills, skills gaps, stages, step by step instructions, student writing, style, teachers, techniques, vivid imagery, vocabulary, voice, writing competitions, Writing Cycle, writing cycle approach, writing instruction, writing process